| ||
|
SOF OnDemand:
» Download (mp3, 53:18) ¦ » Listen Now (RealAudio, 53:00) ¦ » Podcast |
Read more on the show's main page. | |
Transcript of Radio ProgramJune 12, 2008Krista Tippett, Host: I'm Krista Tippett. Today, "Pagans Ancient and Modern." I'll speak with Adrian Ivakhiv, an environmentalist at the University of Vermont and a scholar of Paganism. He was first drawn to Pagan literature because of its strong emphasis on ecology, the natural world, and a sense of place. He's studied how ancient Pagan ideas are woven into Western culture. And he believes that the modern revival of Paganism is fueled by a hunger for sacred landscapes, what he calls "our global condition of homesickness."
Ms. Tippett: This is Speaking of Faith. Stay with us. [Announcements] Ms. Tippett: I'm Krista Tippett. In the Christian West of the last millennium, the word "Pagan" became a pejorative label for non-Christians. In the modern United States, Paganism is loosely associated with New Age spirituality. My guest today, Adrian Ivakhiv, is an environmentalist who pursued the ecology of Paganism from its ancient roots to its modern revival in Europe and North America. We hear his observations this hour about the spirit of Paganism and its influence on everyday Western culture, including old-time religion. From American Public Media, this is Speaking of Faith, public radio's conversation about religion, meaning, ethics, and ideas. Today, "Pagans Ancient and Modern." The word "Pagan" is derived from a Latin word for country dweller or peasant. As early Christianity spread rapidly in the urban areas of the Roman Empire, Pagan became a negative term for those considered too backward to embrace monotheistic faith. In our day, Paganism and Neopaganism are umbrella terms for an array of new religious movements that revive ancient polytheistic ideas of Europe and the Middle East. Religious scholars and sociologists believe that Paganism and Neopaganism are on the rise globally, numbering perhaps from 1 to 3 million adherents. But many people who identify as Pagans privately are reluctant to do so in public. Others embrace Pagan ideas and rituals on a selective basis. And there is some overlap between Pagan faith and New Age spirituality, which touches as much as 20 percent of the U.S. population. My guest today, Adrian Ivakhiv, is a professor of environmental thought and culture at the University of Vermont and the author of a scholarly study, Claiming Sacred Ground: Pilgrims and Politics at Glastonbury and Sedona. I spoke to him in 2006 As a young man, he was drawn to a defining impulse of Pagan traditions, their strong emphasis on ecology, the natural world, and a sense of place. This ecological emphasis runs across the vast spectrum of Pagan beliefs, which often revive practices from agrarian times and places, notably witchcraft or Wicca, the Celtic priestly order of Druids, and the Norse tradition of Asatru. And Adrian Ivakhiv has also traced the pre-Christian roots and modern revival of Pagan ideas in post-Soviet Eastern Europe. His parents were World War II Ukrainian refugees to Canada. They raised him in churches and schools of their Eastern Rite Catholic tradition, a hybrid of Eastern Orthodoxy and Roman Catholicism. Adrian Ivakhiv's cultural identity, as he tells it, was also a hybrid dislocating experience.
Ms. Tippett: Environmentalist and scholar of Paganism Adrian Ivakhiv.
Ms. Tippett: Environmentalist and scholar of Paganism Adrian Ivakhiv. Modern Western arts and theater also freely mingle religious and Pagan ideas with their complementary pull on the human imagination. The wildly popular Lord of the Rings saga of J.R.R. Tolkien, a 20th-century British Catholic writer, combines Christian symbols of good and evil with supernatural images straight from Pagan mythology. Here is the voice of J.R.R. Tolkien reading from his work in Elvish.
Ms. Tippett: I'm Krista Tippett, and this is Speaking of Faith from American Public Media. Today, "Pagans Ancient and Modern." Pagan traditions now on the rise often revive pre-modern attachments to landscape and place. My guest, Adrian Ivakhiv, has given special attention to the resurgence of pre-Christian beliefs in his parents' native Ukraine. There, the Neopagan, Native Faith movement had strong nationalist and xenophobic tendencies. But Ivakhiv says that even this movement found its feet by way of environmentalism. It emerged as a force in Ukrainian life in the wake of the environmental catastrophe of the Chernobyl nuclear meltdown of 1986.
[Announcements] Ms. Tippett: Welcome back to Speaking of Faith, public radio's conversation about religion, meaning, ethics, and ideas. I'm Krista Tippett. Today we're exploring ancient Pagan traditions that are on the rise in many loosely affiliated forms in Europe and North America. Here are some voices from a BBC report called The Real Teenage Witches, about the rise of Paganism among young people in the United Kingdom.
Ms. Tippett: My guest, Adrian Ivakhiv, is a Canadian-born environmentalist and a scholar of Earth-centered Pagan traditions. He believes that these traditions address a sense of dislocation in modern urban people. He also points out that Pagan impulses are woven organically into mainstream cultural and Christian practices. His academic work includes a study of the contemporary appeal of ancient sacred landscapes such as Glastonbury in the British Isles. Glastonbury is revered at once as a cradle of British Christianity and as a possible site of the burial of King Arthur and Queen Guinevere. The Camelot legend in which they are central characters is also peopled by fairies and wizards. And there is the legend that when Jesus was a child, He and the biblical figure Joseph of Arimathea traveled to Glastonbury and built a church there. After the crucifixion, Joseph is said to have traveled back to Britain with the Holy Grail, the cup used by Jesus at the Last Supper. This lore is the backdrop for a popular British hymn, "Jerusalem," which is widely sung today at British religious and civic gatherings. Its lyrics are based on a poem by William Blake. [Audio clip of choir performing "Jerusalem"] Choir: (singing) And did those feet in ancient time / Walk upon England's mountains green? / And was the holy Lamb of God / On England's pleasant pastures seen? / And did the Countenance Divine / Shine forth upon our clouded hills? / And was Jerusalem builded here / Among these dark Satanic mills? Ms. Tippett: Glastonbury became a popular pilgrimage site, especially after England's famous stone circle, Stonehenge, was over run with visitors. Many believe that the Pagan priestly order of Druids was responsible for Stonehenge. And in the 1970s, Neopagan Druids founded an annual summer solstice festival there. It eventually attracted so many participants and onlookers that Stonehenge was cordoned off from the public. Again, environmentalist and scholar of Paganism Adrian Ivakhiv. Mr. Ivakhiv: And one particular summer, there was a lot of violence with police with batons just chasing people around and beating them up and whatever, and a lot of the people ended up gravitating towards Glastonbury because they thought of it as a kind of safe haven. And when I got there, I felt that way, too, because it's got this kind of old Christian tradition, which died out for a while, and yet which now, for Roman Catholics and for Anglicans, it's a pilgrimage center again. But it also has these other traditions attached to it, and somehow they manage to coexist. And I think it's that very coexistence around a particular landscape that I find really interesting and that I think other people might find attractive. And, I mean, you'll find people who've read, women who've read Jean Shinoda Bolen's book Crossing to Avalon, or The Mists of Avalon, which is about — a novel by Marion Zimmer Bradley … Ms. Tippett: Oh, Marion Zimmer Bradley, yes. Mr. Ivakhiv: … about the women in King Arthur's entourage, and they've read these books and they feel that, wow, Avalon, sacred place, Glastonbury — even though, you know, we're not really sure that Avalon was Glastonbury, but it's the place that has the claim to it. And so it attracts this multitude of very different sorts of people on pilgrimages basically, and that is something that I found fascinating. Ms. Tippett: And the Druid tradition and those stories about Glastonbury and Avalon, they have fairies in them and spirits which, in that part of the world, don't seem as outlandish, you know, even to talk about as they do here, which is something I was quite intrigued by when I've been in that part of the world. I mean, and you're a scholar of this. Is it hard to be … Mr. Ivakhiv: Well, it's a challenge, because, you're right, it's hard to be taken seriously if you're talking about fairies and whatnot, and things that are invisible or not known by science. But if you're trying to be taken seriously by intellectuals or scientists or whatever, then you can't really use that language. And yet, in parts of England, people use that language, and they talk about energies in the landscape and … Ms. Tippett: And the little people, yeah. Mr. Ivakhiv: Yeah. And as long as there are going to be mysteries, you know, everybody's going to make an effort to put a face to those mysteries, to kind of draw on whatever stories and tales and narratives and images that have been circulating in order to make sense of those gaps. And that's where it becomes useful, in fact, to acknowledge that these other languages might help people make sense of things. Ms. Tippett: I mean, I've wanted to get into Paganism and Wicca and, you know, then you start growing the list of, somehow, traditions or movements that seem to be somehow connected to that, because I know that many people are interested in them or following them and I think it's important to understand and take seriously. The one thing I have noticed, just getting into the literature of the movement, is that people in these movements themselves tend to — it's just become such a mixed bag, you know. In the same sentence, you'll have someone mention Paganism, which has this long and rich history that you and I have been talking about, or — and extraterrestrials and liberal Christians and occultists. And it's hard to know what "it" is. Mr. Ivakhiv: I think there is a kind of slippery slope where once you've stopped believing that the mainstream discourse, whether that be that of science or whatever else, you've stopped going along with that discourse, then you become open to everything else. And if you're not careful and if you're not judicious, then you'll just kind of start believing that all those other things must therefore be true. So there's that tendency, which you find with social movements that are on the fringes. And I've been fascinated by all of it because I think that even the extraterrestrial thing, how many millions of people claim to have been abducted by aliens in American society? Ms. Tippett: I know. Mr. Ivakhiv: What do you do with that fact? Do you just say that they're all deluded or do you start getting interested in why it is that, you know, there's some kind of gap that people are filling with using that imagery of aliens. Why aliens? Well, because there aren't any fairies left so they got to come from off planet. Why are there no fairies left? Because we know … Ms. Tippett: Right. That's one explanation. Mr. Ivakhiv: … we know what happens in the natural world. It's all managed forests and whatever else, is almost the best we get. So it becomes a kind of mystery to solve. And rather than rejecting the things that people say, I think, as an ethnographer of religion, one of the first principles is that you don't treat people as idiots for what they believe and that, in fact, by treating them seriously, you might get some insights that you wouldn't get to otherwise. And I think, for me, it's led to insights about myself as well. Ms. Tippett: Well, tell me about some of those, would you? Mr. Ivakhiv: Well, you know, we all have our quirks, I suppose, and in my case, I've discovered that I really do feel a strong attraction to particular kinds of landscapes, you know, geographical places. And I can't quite explain it. There's something that's very physical about it or very kind of sensory, and there's something that's even not quite that tangible. And so I'm drawn to particular places and I want to feel connected to them. So why is that? That's sort of my question. Ms. Tippett: Right. Mr. Ivakhiv: And what does it mean? And are there other people who feel that? And if so — I mean, take a movie like Close Encounters of the Third Kind, which I think … Ms. Tippett: Yeah, I was just going to mention that, yeah. Mr. Ivakhiv: … is a terrible, in some ways, movie. But it's got this very weird thing going on where all these people are imagining a certain rock formation that ends up being Devil's Tower. Ms. Tippett: And they start — these various kinds of people start making these shapes out of mud in their yard or … Mr. Ivakhiv: They're — yeah, out of potatoes. Ms. Tippett: Yeah, whatever they have going in their kitchen. Mr. Ivakhiv: Mashed potatoes or mud, yeah. Ms. Tippett: And it turns out to be the shape of this mountain that they all go to where the ship comes down. Mr. Ivakhiv: That's right, exactly. And, I mean, you could look at that and you could say, well, it's, you know, Hollywood stupefying us all, trying to make us think that intuition is going to solve all our problems and make us all happy. And you could do various kinds of analyses of how that film is not very good in terms of making people rational, but, at the same time, just the very idea that there's this particular place that looks that way and that people have some sort of tactile response to. Ms. Tippett: Environmentalist Adrian Ivakhiv. [Excerpt from Close Encounters of the Third Kind] Ms. Tippett: From Steven Spielberg's classic movie Close Encounters of the Third Kind. I'm Krista Tippett, and this is Speaking of Faith from American Public Media. Today, "Pagans Ancient and Modern." Ms. Tippett: Pagan and New Age literature is full of anecdotes of people being drawn to particular landscapes as if by a force beyond oneself. For my guest, Adrian Ivakhiv, the lure of Paganism includes a strong regard for the mystery and beauty of geography, especially raw, dramatic landscapes such as coastal areas, hills, and mountains. But I asked him, haven't most people had some experience of awe at natural beauty that they can't explain? Is part of the power of Pagan spiritual traditions that they validate this elemental human experience? Mr. Ivakhiv: I think they do, and I think they can validate them in different ways, and we have to be careful where we take that validation. But I definitely think they do that, because, you know, to the extent that they're responding to the feeling that we lack a connection with the world around us, with that material world around us, I think these traditions are attempting to validate that experience by telling us that, well, there are places that should be considered sacred and that should be treated respectfully and shouldn't be — there shouldn't be some sort of commercial developments everywhere. So how do we decide which places we want to keep aside? I think the national parks serve that function for a lot of people in this country. Ms. Tippett: Right. Preserving sacred spaces. Mr. Ivakhiv: Even though, you know, they're being managed for the tourism, and they're not what a lot of people think they are. But, nevertheless, they represent something that's very important. Ms. Tippett: Let's say, in the New Age literature, then, though there seems to be a very fine line between talking about experiences that many of us would call spiritual, even just this sense of wonder before nature, and then veering off into language of, you know, magic and spells, and I wonder, how do you think about that as a scholar? Mr. Ivakhiv: Well, oddly enough, I try to. I'm not sure about the spells so much, but, certainly, about the — insofar as magic is about making connections or believing that there are connections between things, some of which science tells us aren't connected. So a piece of hair from someone has some sort of strange connection to that person even long after they're gone. Well, we do want to believe those sorts of things. Why do we hang stuff up on our walls and we — when we move into a new apartment or a new house, we completely fill that place with our own images and symbols, and they represent certain associations, certain memories. They make them our own, those places. And we're cultural creatures. We live in image and story. That's what we swim in. And I think, in a sense, magic is just another way of saying that that's what we're always doing. We're making connections between those things, and those connections are meaningful and they're embodied in particular objects, in particular images, in particular sounds. Music has a kind of magical effect on people … Ms. Tippett: Yes, it does, yeah. Mr. Ivakhiv: … because the first time when you heard a certain piece of music affects you, because of the context, and then every time you hear it afterwards, it brings all that back. Ms. Tippett: It's almost like a spell, isn't it? And now we can find out it works something in the brain that, in fact, brings those memories back physically. Mr. Ivakhiv: Absolutely. So the brain is a magical object in which connections are being forged by all sorts of activities, and we may as well admit that. Now, that doesn't mean that everything that everybody says, if you read some popular book on magic, is, you know, should be taken as literal truth. But there's something that is being said underneath it all that I think is worth thinking about. Ms. Tippett: You know, when we began to speak, you talked about how you have an idea that there's — and how you've experienced a sense of kind of global homesickness. I wonder how you think about how Paganism and these ideas and traditions we've been discussing, how they meet that, how they fill that longing in people. Mr. Ivakhiv: Well, you know, there are different variations on that longing. I think a lot of people feel displaced because, in fact, some are. Some have been refugees and have had to move from their homeland, and they have a fairly concrete idea of what they're homesick for. It's that land that they were displaced from. In my case, it was a land that was a kind of figment of my imagination. I had never been there; I only learned about it in school and was taught about it and told about it. So it wasn't quite a reality of my own memory, and it allowed me to ask questions about, well, what is that homesickness that I'm feeling? In terms of some different Pagan traditions and how they might meet that, I think, you know, there's a lot of people wanting to connect themselves to a particular place. I think the whole Roots Alex Haley phenomenon in the '70s, in a sense, maybe launched that. But it made it fairly widespread and gave it a certain credibility that, you know, if we can trace our roots to a particular place, that makes us more than what we otherwise are. And I'm not sure how that was in the U.S., but growing up in Canada, after a while it became almost normal that, you know, a lot of Canadians were hyphenated Canadians. You were either Anglo- or French-Canadian or Ukrainian-Canadian or something else, Greek-Canadian, and that was pretty par for the course. Ms. Tippett: We're still doing that. Mr. Ivakhiv: Yeah. So that kind of grafting something on to one's identity in order to feel more whole is part of it. And that sounds like a kind of superficial thing, but if it allows you to explore something that makes your life more satisfying and that also allows you to feel somehow, you know, if it's not just an imagined thing, that if you actually go back to that Ireland of your ancestors and you're not treated as this, you know, great, long-lost relative and given this great homecoming, what do you do with that? Well, maybe that's what people like that need to do in order to finally realize that, well, it's not about that place necessarily, it's about a place in our hearts that's feeling a kind of emptiness. And what does that say about our everyday lives? Ms. Tippett: You made this connection, I just wrote it down this way, between ecology and identity. I think we've talked around that and about it, but is there anything else you would say about how you see the connection between those two words? Mr. Ivakhiv: Well, I guess I see that connection as one way that we can get around some of the sorts of issues that the world faces. And you find this very much in Europe and in the places that we were talking about, where there are ethnic groups that stake different claims to the same territory. And if we get to know that place — I'm working on a project right now that's looking at the Carpathian Mountain region in Eastern and Central Europe, and that's a region that spans eight different nations, eight different countries. And potentially the relationships between those countries are — they might not always be very good. You know, you've got the boundary of the European Union running through there. And in other parts of the world, boundaries like that actually have ethnic hostilities. But if we learn to see ourselves more in terms of the place where we live rather than these kind of national or ethnic narratives, if we learn to incorporate those narratives into the narrative of the place, all of that can, in a sense, refocus what we do living in that place. Ms. Tippett: Adrian Ivakhiv is an associate professor of environmental thought and culture at the University of Vermont. He's also the author of an academic study, Claiming Sacred Ground: Pilgrims and Politics at Glastonbury and Sedona. In editing my 2006 interview with Adrian Ivakhiv, we had to omit stories about the difference between Pagan revivals in Europe and the U.S. and the idea that Earth-based spirituality is inherent in most religious traditions. Well, now you can hear all these unheard cuts and more on our Web site and podcast. Download MP3s of my unedited conversation and this produced program, for free, at speakingoffaith.org. Also, check out SOF Observed, our fresh and fun take on blogging that includes you in the production process. That's speakingoffaith.org. The senior producer of Speaking of Faith is Mitch Hanley, with producers Colleen Scheck, Shiraz Janjua, and Rob McGinley Myers, with help from Alda Balthrop-Lewis. Our online editor is Trent Gilliss, with Web producer Andrew Dayton. Kate Moos is the managing producer of Speaking of Faith, and I'm Krista Tippett. |
||